summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/tests/hash:net6,port.t.list1
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>2020-02-20 07:59:14 -0600
committerJozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@netfilter.org>2020-09-20 12:26:15 +0200
commitb62e1ef34c18c1734593b81de481021f8fbb866e (patch)
tree9a1b14d5701511561c2f46ea7d7b957d31e6d4f5 /tests/hash:net6,port.t.list1
parentcc93f943de61ea552884c6b0ab2510136c4ac8f2 (diff)
netfilter: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] Lastly, fix checkpatch.pl warning WARNING: __aligned(size) is preferred over __attribute__((aligned(size))) in net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> Signed-off-by: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@netfilter.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'tests/hash:net6,port.t.list1')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions