From c0194279d356f942e81555262e41264af7659a1f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Florian Westphal Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2023 17:29:50 +0100 Subject: evaluate: error out when existing set has incompatible key Before: BUG: invalid range expression type symbol nft: expression.c:1494: range_expr_value_high: Assertion `0' failed. After: range_expr_value_high_assert:5:20-27: Error: Could not resolve protocol name elements = { 100-11.0.0.0, } ^^^^^^^^ range_expr_value_high_assert:7:6-7: Error: set definition has conflicting key (ipv4_addr vs inet_proto) Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal --- .../testcases/bogons/nft-f/range_expr_value_high_assert | 12 ++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) create mode 100644 tests/shell/testcases/bogons/nft-f/range_expr_value_high_assert (limited to 'tests/shell/testcases/bogons') diff --git a/tests/shell/testcases/bogons/nft-f/range_expr_value_high_assert b/tests/shell/testcases/bogons/nft-f/range_expr_value_high_assert new file mode 100644 index 00000000..a25ac028 --- /dev/null +++ b/tests/shell/testcases/bogons/nft-f/range_expr_value_high_assert @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ +table inet t { + set s3 { + type inet_proto + flags interval + elements = { 100-11.0.0.0, } + } + set s3 { + type ipv4_addr + flags interval + elements = { 100-11.0.0.0, } + } +} -- cgit v1.2.3