From b450c12223c4fc3fd8389809dace7dbccd513e95 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Haller Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2023 21:59:24 +0200 Subject: tests/shell: run `nft --check` on persisted dump files "nft --check" will trigger a rollback in kernel. The existing dump files might hit new code paths. Take the opportunity to call the command on the existing files. And alternative would be to write a separate tests, that iterates over all files. However, then we can only run all the commands sequentially (unless we do something smart). That might be slower than the opportunity to run the checks in parallel. More importantly, it would be nice if the check for the dump file is clearly tied to the file's test. So run it right after the test, from the test wrapper. Signed-off-by: Thomas Haller Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal --- tests/shell/helpers/test-wrapper.sh | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ tests/shell/run-tests.sh | 4 +++- 2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'tests/shell') diff --git a/tests/shell/helpers/test-wrapper.sh b/tests/shell/helpers/test-wrapper.sh index 165a944d..e10360c9 100755 --- a/tests/shell/helpers/test-wrapper.sh +++ b/tests/shell/helpers/test-wrapper.sh @@ -134,6 +134,35 @@ if [ "$rc_dump" -ne 0 ] ; then echo "$DUMPFILE" > "$NFT_TEST_TESTTMPDIR/rc-failed-dump" fi +rc_chkdump=0 +# check that a flush after the test succeeds. We anyway need a clean ruleset +# for the `nft --check` next. +$NFT flush ruleset &> "$NFT_TEST_TESTTMPDIR/rc-failed-chkdump" || rc_chkdump=1 +if [ -f "$DUMPFILE" ] ; then + # We have a dumpfile. Call `nft --check` to possibly cover new code + # paths. + if [ "$rc_test" -eq 77 ] ; then + # The test was skipped. Possibly we don't have the required + # features to process this file. Ignore any output and exit + # code, but still call the program (for valgrind or sanitizer + # issue we hope to find). + $NFT --check -f "$DUMPFILE" &>/dev/null || : + else + $NFT --check -f "$DUMPFILE" &>> "$NFT_TEST_TESTTMPDIR/rc-failed-chkdump" || rc_chkdump=1 + fi +fi +if [ -s "$NFT_TEST_TESTTMPDIR/rc-failed-chkdump" ] ; then + # Non-empty output? That is wrong. + rc_chkdump=1 +elif [ "$rc_chkdump" -eq 0 ] ; then + rm -rf "$NFT_TEST_TESTTMPDIR/rc-failed-chkdump" +fi +if [ "$rc_chkdump" -ne 0 ] ; then + # Ensure we don't have empty output files. Always write something, so + # that `grep ^ -R` lists the file. + echo -e "<<<<<\n\nCalling \`nft --check\` (or \`nft flush ruleset\`) failed for \"$DUMPFILE\"" >> "$NFT_TEST_TESTTMPDIR/rc-failed-chkdump" +fi + rc_valgrind=0 [ -f "$NFT_TEST_TESTTMPDIR/rc-failed-valgrind" ] && rc_valgrind=1 @@ -154,6 +183,8 @@ elif [ "$rc_test" -ne 0 ] ; then rc_exit="$rc_test" elif [ "$rc_dump" -ne 0 ] ; then rc_exit=124 +elif [ "$rc_chkdump" -ne 0 ] ; then + rc_exit=121 else rc_exit=0 fi diff --git a/tests/shell/run-tests.sh b/tests/shell/run-tests.sh index 03021085..5ef6359f 100755 --- a/tests/shell/run-tests.sh +++ b/tests/shell/run-tests.sh @@ -740,7 +740,9 @@ print_test_result() { else ((failed++)) result_msg_level="W" - if [ "$rc_got" -eq 122 ] ; then + if [ "$rc_got" -eq 121 ] ; then + result_msg_status="CHK DUMP" + elif [ "$rc_got" -eq 122 ] ; then result_msg_status="VALGRIND" elif [ "$rc_got" -eq 123 ] ; then result_msg_status="TAINTED" -- cgit v1.2.3