| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Due to a typo, 127bit prefixes were omitted instead of 128bit ones.
Reported-by: Laine Stump <laine@redhat.com>
Fixes: a88e4b4ac1a1b ("Print IPv6 prefixes in CIDR notation")
Signed-off-by: Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
According to RFC4291, IPv6 prefixes are represented in CIDR notation.
While the use of a "netmask" notation is not explicitly denied, its
existence merely stems from applying IPv4 standards to IPv6. This is not
necessarily correct.
Therefore change printing of IPv6 prefixes to use CIDR notation as long
as the address mask's bits are left contiguous.
Signed-off-by: Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We already have ICMPv6 type/code matches (which can be used to distinguish
different types of MLD packets). Add support for IPv4 IGMP matches in the
same way.
To reuse as much code as possible, the ICMP type/code handling functions
are extended to allow passing a NULL code range.
Signed-off-by: Matthias Schiffer <mschiffer@universe-factory.net>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Allow using these functions for ebt_ip as well.
Signed-off-by: Matthias Schiffer <mschiffer@universe-factory.net>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
<mmazur at axeos.com>)
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|