diff options
author | Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> | 2018-11-02 14:36:54 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> | 2018-11-03 20:35:22 +0100 |
commit | fd95f1f0223f8e2ecf91aa8d1a4ba84576861082 (patch) | |
tree | 3f3d5eccdd114000afa0a81de80dd2a492286cda /extensions/libip6t_DNAT.t | |
parent | fb747f8ae01bdcbb197f5f9fc1085416ad636d38 (diff) |
ebtables: fix -j CONTINUE handling for add/delete
-j CONTINUE can be added, but it can't be removed:
extensions/libebt_standard.t: ERROR: line 5 (cannot find: ebtables -I INPUT -d de:ad:be:ef:00:00 -j CONTINUE)
This problem stems from silly ambiguity in ebtables-nft vs. iptables.
In iptables, you can do
iptables -A INPUT
(no -j)
in ebtables, you can do either
ebtables -A INPUT
or
ebtables -A INPUT -j CONTINUE
both are *supposed* to be the same (and they do the same even
in ebtables-nft on netlink side).
However, the temprary binary representation within ebtables-nft is not
the same: when parsing -j CONTINUE, we add a standard target, then omit
it later in _add_target().
When translating netlink representation to ebt binary one,
we do not add a standard target and instead just print '-j CONTINUE'
when listing rules.
So when doing
-I INPUT -j CONTINUE
-D INPUT -j CONTINUE
the -D operation fails because it has a standard target in the binary
representation, whereas the rule we obtained from translating
nftables netlink back to ebtables' binary represenation doesn't.
Fix it by ignoring 'CONTINUE' on parser side.
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Diffstat (limited to 'extensions/libip6t_DNAT.t')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions