summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/extensions/libebt_stp.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorPhil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>2019-02-05 18:18:02 +0100
committerFlorian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>2019-02-05 18:19:59 +0100
commit35b22e82fa62e10950d8e0fa53a755d4abadf346 (patch)
tree9eae6b69c634d607d71d9cf5d9caeb02797cf604 /extensions/libebt_stp.c
parent148131f20421046fea028e638581e938ec985783 (diff)
Revert "ebtables: use extrapositioned negation consistently"
This reverts commit 5f508b76a0cebaf91965ffa678089222e2d47964. While attempts at unifying syntax between arp-, eb- and iptables-nft increase the opportunity for more code-sharing, they are problematic when it comes to compatibility. Accepting the old syntax on input helps, but due to the fact that neither arptables nor ebtables support --check command we must expect for users to test existence of a rule by comparing input with output. If that happens in a script, deviating from the old syntax in output has a high chance of breaking it. Therefore revert Florian's patch changing inversion character position in output and review the old code for consistency - the only thing changed on top of the actual revert is ebtables' own copy of print_iface() to make it adhere to the intrapositioned negation scheme used throughout ebtables. Added extension tests by the reverted commit have been kept. Signed-off-by: Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc> Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Diffstat (limited to 'extensions/libebt_stp.c')
-rw-r--r--extensions/libebt_stp.c5
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/extensions/libebt_stp.c b/extensions/libebt_stp.c
index 33e4c8d9..06cf93b8 100644
--- a/extensions/libebt_stp.c
+++ b/extensions/libebt_stp.c
@@ -307,9 +307,8 @@ static void brstp_print(const void *ip, const struct xt_entry_match *match,
for (i = 0; i < STP_NUMOPS; i++) {
if (!(stpinfo->bitmask & (1 << i)))
continue;
- if (stpinfo->invflags & (1 << i))
- printf("! ");
- printf("--%s ", brstp_opts[i].name);
+ printf("--%s %s", brstp_opts[i].name,
+ (stpinfo->invflags & (1 << i)) ? "! " : "");
if (EBT_STP_TYPE == (1 << i)) {
if (stpinfo->type == BPDU_TYPE_CONFIG)
printf("%s", BPDU_TYPE_CONFIG_STRING);